Business Briefing (Crabstone)

Richemont Sold the Entry Watch to Guard the Vault

Richemont is selling Baume & Mercier, its most affordable watch brand, to Damiani, while posting a 30.5% jewellery margin against 3.5% in watches. In a market where spending is pooling at the very top, pruning the entry-price label is concentration, not retreat.

Sir John Crabstone

In January, Richemont agreed to sell Baume & Mercier, the most affordable of its Swiss watch brands, to the Italian jeweller Damiani. Founded in 1830, it sold watches at prices a Vacheron Constantin buyer would never notice. In a market splitting between the very rich and everyone else, dropping the entry-price brand concentrates the group where the money now sits. A house that owns Cartier has decided it can no longer afford to be affordable.

The accounts explain the logic without sentiment. In the year to March, Richemont’s jewellery maisons, led by Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels, grew sales 8% to €16.5 billion and €5 billion of operating profit. The specialist watchmakers fell 4%, to €3.1 billion of sales and €107 million of profit. That is 2% of what the two divisions earned between them. The vault returns thirty cents on the euro; the workshops return three and a half.

The market has been signalling this for two years. Bain and Altagamma put the personal-luxury business at about €358 billion, its client base down from 400 million people in 2022 to roughly 340 million. Its biggest spenders, meanwhile, lifted their share of the money from 30% in 2019 to nearly half by 2024, some €165 billion. The buyers who left were the ones who spent least; those who stayed had, by 2024, nearly doubled their total spend. Bain now describes that concentration as flattening at roughly 46% in 2025.

Damiani wants precisely what Richemont is shedding. Both companies say Baume & Mercier will do best inside the Italian group, citing its wholesale reach and “accessible positioning in the luxury watch segment.” One house is buying an entrance to the category; the other has decided it no longer needs one. Each is right, from where it stands.

Baume & Mercier’s failing was never the watch; it was the customer the watch was made for.

The trade press filed the sale under weakness. WWD called Baume & Mercier loss-making, a brand that Kepler Cheuvreux, in a note cited by WWD, said had struggled for years, and the description is fair. Yet a business earning next to nothing from a departing buyer is exactly the asset a concentrating group should sell. Keeping it out of sentiment would have been the weakness.

Richemont prefers the language of virtue. Its chairman, Johann Rupert, lists “disciplined pricing” among the reasons for a strong year. Discipline is the courteous word for deciding which customers you will no longer try to keep.

There is one wager buried in the tidy logic. The entry watch is also the first watch, the one that teaches a buyer to want a costlier one, that converts a civilian into a collector. Richemont has decided it can recruit tomorrow’s buyers without ever selling them their first. Whether aspiration travels upward without a ground floor is a question the sale does not answer. It will not settle for years.